The Book Award Blight: Too Many Prizes, Too Little Meaning

Celebrating exceptional writing is a worthy aim. The Publishing Times argues, as a matter of opinion, that an overproliferation of book awards risks wearing away their meaning for authors, for publishers and, most importantly, for readers.

Long-established prizes include the Pulitzer Prizes, first awarded in 1917, and the Booker Prize, first awarded in 1969, and they now sit alongside many niche and regional honors. Some argue that more awards mean more chances for deserving authors to be recognized, and awards can indeed offer real validation and draw new readers to winners, as the study cited below found. The concern this editorial raises is that the more awards there are, the less a gold sticker on the cover can tell a reader.

The Dilution of Distinction

The core problem is the dilution of distinction. At its best, a book award should lift a work above the crowd and declare it exceptional. Awards that charge entry fees and do not publish their judging criteria give readers little way to tell what an endorsement means.

The integrity of the judging process is central to an award's prestige. An award with real impact should be a demanding test, not a participation trophy.

Reader Fatigue and Lost Trust

Even prestigious awards do not always leave readers happier. A 2014 study by Balázs Kovács and Amanda Sharkey in Administrative Science Quarterly compared Goodreads reviews of 64 books that won or were shortlisted for major prizes between 2007 and 2011. Winners attracted more readers after the announcement, but their ratings declined more steeply than those of the shortlisted books. The authors attribute this to a larger audience with more varied tastes, and to some readers reacting against popularity itself. Harvard Business Review summarized the decline as about a quarter of a point on a five-point scale over two years.

Awards are not only marketing tools. At their best they introduce readers to voices and stories they might otherwise never find, and this editorial's view is that a crowded field makes that job harder.

A book award should be a lighthouse, not a flickering streetlamp in a city of perpetual twilight.

A more selective approach to literary honors would help. Possible steps include consolidating awards, renewing the focus on transparent judging and committing to literary excellence over marketing convenience. The awards worth supporting are those that stand as clear markers of quality rather than adding to the present din. Authors would be wise to weigh whether the cost and effort of chasing every gilded ribbon actually serves their long-term literary reputation. The stronger path is to concentrate on writing an excellent book and let the right recognition follow. Readers looking for thoughtful literary commentary can subscribe to The Publishing Times for measured perspectives on the industry, and writers can turn to a classic such as The Elements of Style by Strunk and White to sharpen their craft (The Elements of Style on Amazon).

As an Amazon Associate, The Publishing Times earns from qualifying purchases.